1) That the price of decay is constant throughout time. 2). That the isotope abundances within the specimen dated haven’t been changed during its history by addition or elimination of either moms and dad or daughter isotopes 3) that after the stone first formed it included a known amount of child product (“Radioisotopes plus the chronilogical age of the planet earth” pg v)
We ought to notice that past processes may never be occurring at all today, and therefore some could have taken place at prices and intensities far distinctive from comparable processes today. ( “Radioisotopes in addition to chronilogical age of the planet earth” pg vii)
Jesus cursed the floor (the stones too!)
See my commentary on Genesis 3 verse 17 “..cursed may be the ground for the sake”
Whenever this occurred there is a burst of radioactity that made the stones appear more than these people were.
Would not this make all of the rocks look the exact same age?
“The stone real question is fairly easy and has now related to the elements that are basic constructed these stones at first. When all these elements, uranium, potassium, radium etc. were started up, it can simply be normal to allow them to behave based on their properties that are individual fundamentally acquiring stable half-lives of decay, at various prices. Suppose at waplog first every element that is radioactive “exploded” into presence from pre-existent elements. None of the early quicker half-lives is the just like they’ve been today.
As time progressed each would commence to obtain its slow modern-day stable half-life, but would all of them get these stable prices in a uniformity which may have them all in synchrony? We question it. When they did, all would provide equivalent many years, you’re appropriate. Each could possibly get to balance at differing times. Continue reading “Dating methods are derived from 3 unprovable and debateable assumptions:”