The point that gets me personally is the fact that and also being “undetectable” to search-engines, they do say that this technique is “ethical. ”

The point that gets me personally is the fact that and also being “undetectable” to search-engines, they do say that this technique is “ethical. ”

The conversation when you look at the comments includes details from John Scott in addition to excerpts on a debate regarding the ethical and legal status regarding the contextual links solution.

Matt, doorway pages have particular features which can be detected and you also actually break me up whenever you make an effort to declare that you dudes will be in a position to detect contextual links which can be purchased vs contextual links which are simply simple linking that is natural.

Thousands of people url to internet web web sites volunteerly in an all-natural means every single day, wityhout being bothered just exactly just what Google believes that you could see the difference between those and those who get paid, we are not talking about doorway pages here about it and I doubt. You compare oranges with pears. The fact you posted which makes me genuinely believe that you dudes at google are receiving stressed.

We like this, We hate the commercialisation for the web and I also hate those spammed by goooogle pages that you will be responcible for.

I’m a non commercial, non revenue webmaster whom gets spammed in great amounts by adsense pages on a regular basis, I’m happy to see I am too that you are annoyed.

It is loved by me! Also five years later it is nevertheless funny ?? Continue reading “The point that gets me personally is the fact that and also being “undetectable” to search-engines, they do say that this technique is “ethical. ””